|
Post by sukeats on Jul 25, 2003 11:32:07 GMT 8
i just read in aggressivemall.com that K2 is bringing back the fatty - - with updates - and its gonna b called the UFS Fatty.
man...i dont know why - but im excited bout these even though i havent even seen one pic of it - sentimental value i guess. after all ive been through 3 pairs of fatties. and they are one of the best skates of their time.
whatcha say yeng? we ditch the current skates we have and balik K2. screw the nemesis.
|
|
|
Post by KEiTh on Jul 25, 2003 13:56:25 GMT 8
here the skate keat
|
|
|
Post by sukeats on Jul 25, 2003 14:45:31 GMT 8
whoa - that was efficent of u....thanks kieth.
oh crud - - it looks like shit.
|
|
|
Post by sukeats on Jul 25, 2003 14:46:16 GMT 8
oh well.....guess ill stick to the TRSs then.
|
|
|
Post by KEiTh on Jul 25, 2003 15:06:27 GMT 8
It's like the junior Eric Shcrin Pro skate
|
|
|
Post by H1ghr0773r on Jul 25, 2003 15:34:07 GMT 8
looks like crap.... dammit
|
|
|
Post by fraser on Jul 25, 2003 17:23:21 GMT 8
hate to tell u this boyz but fattys always looked like crap damnit!
|
|
|
Post by VOBS on Jul 25, 2003 17:37:29 GMT 8
hahaha, i second fraser's view point, sides, last time tarmac trs rules...maybe malaysia tak boleh dapat, u guys go for fatty lor...easy to get mar...its like udang tarak, ikan pun boleh....joking only ar, no offence intended for those who cannot take the joke kekekeke
|
|
|
Post by Bªñ ¿£3º jB on Jul 25, 2003 19:43:41 GMT 8
hey tats the limited edition january 2003 edition laaa
the new one i heard is something like nemesis but the design more fierce........but the colour combo is rite
|
|
|
Post by sukeats on Jul 26, 2003 10:45:21 GMT 8
eh - fak u vincent! ini tak bole let go. fatties were miles ahead of Tarmac CEs....i mean c'mon! the damn things had a gap between the frames and the boot for god's sake. and lets not even talk bout its looks...
if u wanna compare the fatties - - put it up agaisnt the majestics.
i might b out on a limb here - but the fatties still look ok compared to some of the skates today...
well - hopefully mr. Bun from JB is right and the real UFS Fatty is more 'fierce'.
|
|
|
Post by fraser on Jul 26, 2003 11:48:12 GMT 8
majestics. yeah bitch! majestics were cool. unfortunately from what i heard fatties were better to skate on though. no dissin u fatty people (no pun intended) but i just dont like the look. everyone still tells me that they were the best to learn on. oh by the way vince, DONT support ksgskate. the owner dy is a fuck head. he throws lil tantrums like a girl. i dont want to support someone who cant grow up.
|
|
|
Post by VOBS on Jul 26, 2003 12:02:37 GMT 8
hahah, well, at least tarmac dont fall off so easily hehehe, Majestic rules also, and from what i see, the majestic is a soup up version of the old skates....and majestic rules....and they dont fall off easily heheheheh well lets forget the past, and flow into the future....new trs rulesssss but still, why the soul is so sticky compare to other skate ar? hmmm any reason for that? maybe pro skater nowadays go tooooo fast thats why they slow down the soul issit??? hmmm
|
|
|
Post by sukeats on Jul 26, 2003 13:43:38 GMT 8
nooooooooooooo.
fatty!
haha. how juvenile.
but its nice to talk to people who actually started on tarmacs, lightnings, majestics, fatties and argons.
ah....simpler days..... when wheels were just a choice between senate and kryptos. and the decisions to make when choosing grindplates. and frames....What frame?
|
|
|
Post by VOBS on Jul 26, 2003 15:37:23 GMT 8
fiddy fiddy frames are good, those classic ones are so smooth.
i dunno bout those new ufs ones cos never really have a chance to try it
Senate suck, the h-block can come off anytime without u noticing it, the height of the frame is more or less the same with GC first gen so its high...lousy.
|
|
|
Post by fraser on Jul 26, 2003 22:58:41 GMT 8
hey. frames oso got choice la. u choose to have frames or to run around in the boots without them. haha
|
|